This is a Google translation of a page from the now defunct French website Rael: Messiah or Liar? Please visit the original site to cross reference this translation with its source material in French.
Claude Adamskilhon or George Vorilhonski?
Analyze the testimony of George Adamski in parallel with that of Claude Vorilhon.
| A Terran Meets an Extra-Terrestrial | |
George Adamski in 1952 | Claude Vorilhon in 1973 |
| " FLYING SAUCERS landed " | " The book that speaks the truth " |
| First meeting : November 20, 1952 (back of the book) | First meeting : 13 December 1973 (page 15) |
| Since my youth , I have the certainty that other planets are inhabited . (Page 200) | A flying saucer ! I had believed in it for a long time but I did not hope to see it myself one day. (Page 16) |
| I am George Adamski, philosopher, student, teacher, interested in the problem of flying saucers . (Page 199) | It is a subject [telepathy] that has always interestedme and everything that concerns what men call " flying saucers " (page 19) |
| Smiling young man . (Page 231) | He smiled slightly at me . (Page 17) |
| He had (...) big gray eyes slightly almond-shaped. (Page 233) | His eyes were slightly bridled . (Page 17) |
| He was dressed in a kind of suit (page 233) | He was wearing a suit (page 17) |
| I could see neither zipper, nor buttons, nor staples of any kind; We could not even see the seams . I still wonder how this garment was sewn, if it was. (Page 234) | One - piece all - body suit (page 17) |
| His only reaction was a slight nod of his head (page 235) | [I] tilted the head slightly (...). He replied by the same sign . (Page 17) |
| We can express ourselves ( ...) by means of telepathy (sic) . (Page 235) | Do you believe in telepathy ? Yes, of course . (Page 19) |
| December 13 - The second visit (page 160) | The second message (" the aliens have taken me to their planet ", page 49) |
The extraterrestrial encounters of George Adamski and Claude Vorilhon are, by chance, largely identical. Did Claude Vorilhon plagiarize Adamski?
To find out, let's compare the flying saucer of George Adamski with that of Claude Vorilhon.
To find out, let's compare the flying saucer of George Adamski with that of Claude Vorilhon.
| A Terran meets an Extra-Terrestrial ... descended from his FLYING SAUCER | |
| George Adamski in 1952 | Claude Vorilhon in 1973 |
| " FLYING SAUCERS landed " | " The book that tells the truth " Black and white drawings, pages 122 and 123 |
| It was a wonderful little machine, looking more like a heavy bell of glassas a flying saucer. However I could not see through it, just as one sees through these bricks of glass used in buildingsmodern, which allow a better wall of brick , with all the light entering the house or in the office. This glass was translucent and of an exquisite color. (Page 249) When I was closer to the craft, I noticed a ball on top of it , which seemed to me a kind of objective. |   |
It can be seen that the drawings of Claude Vorilhon illustrate admirably the flying saucer ... of George Adamski! Claude Vorilhon has plagiarized Adamski. Moreover, conscious that these sketches, too, pointed out his plagiarism on Adamski, claude Vorilhon thought it better to suppress them in his last editions of the "Book that tells the truth " ...
The flying saucer of George Adamski contained some different details Of that of Claude Vorilhon, which only reinforces plagiarism: plagiarism is not copied in-extenso but partially copied by adding slight variations.
Do you still doubt? Perfect ... let me put my cherry on the cake. (Plagiarized version: place my ball on the dome)
The flying saucer of George Adamski contained some different details Of that of Claude Vorilhon, which only reinforces plagiarism: plagiarism is not copied in-extenso but partially copied by adding slight variations.
Do you still doubt? Perfect ... let me put my cherry on the cake. (Plagiarized version: place my ball on the dome)
When George Adamski speaks of the structure of his flying saucer floating a few meters in front of him, he writes:
" On the face that presented itself to me (...) the wall was smooth "
" FLYING SAUCERS landed ", page 251
When George Adamski looks inside his flying saucer (which is fitted with portholes), he writes:" FLYING SAUCERS landed ", page 251
" The portholes had to be made of another material because they were transparent "
" FLYING SAUCERS landed ", page 251
" FLYING SAUCERS landed ", page 251
George Adamski uses the word "wall" and "material", which is perfectly adequate for describing a spacecraft, or any other flying object (helicopter, plane, rocket ...). Claude Vorilhon, on the other hand, talks about the walls of his flying saucer. It is not at all normal to use this term to describe the walls of a flying saucer. When George Adamski talking about walls , it evokes the walls built of bricks of some buildings .
Airplanes, helicopters and, even more, small extraterrestrial spacecraft, have what are usually called walls , or, in a nutshell , a fuselage , Then why, but why, Claude Vorilhon speaks of walls while he is not in a building but in a small spacecraft, like airplane or ultra-advanced helicopter ?! (You would speak about the walls of the Space Shuttle if you were invited on board?!)
The answer is very simple: Claude Vorilhon was trapped by the text he plagiarized!
Put yourself in the place of a plagiar who reads the description of Adamski to retain the good ideas to modify them to produce his plagiarism:
" Let's see ..., bell-shaped saucer, good idea ... Glass ... it's too characteristic, we're going to make metal shiny, it's more classic ... Walls of glass that let the light pass ... ah, yes, good idea ... to modify ... We will say ... walls completely transparent, it would be better ... or so ... let's think about doing more Perfected ... ah! I found: walls that becometransparent when seated . Great ! I have my saucer of a new type entirely unpublished: bell-shaped, shiny metal and with walls that become transparent when seated ... "
Airplanes, helicopters and, even more, small extraterrestrial spacecraft, have what are usually called walls , or, in a nutshell , a fuselage , Then why, but why, Claude Vorilhon speaks of walls while he is not in a building but in a small spacecraft, like airplane or ultra-advanced helicopter ?! (You would speak about the walls of the Space Shuttle if you were invited on board?!)
The answer is very simple: Claude Vorilhon was trapped by the text he plagiarized!
Put yourself in the place of a plagiar who reads the description of Adamski to retain the good ideas to modify them to produce his plagiarism:
" Let's see ..., bell-shaped saucer, good idea ... Glass ... it's too characteristic, we're going to make metal shiny, it's more classic ... Walls of glass that let the light pass ... ah, yes, good idea ... to modify ... We will say ... walls completely transparent, it would be better ... or so ... let's think about doing more Perfected ... ah! I found: walls that becometransparent when seated . Great ! I have my saucer of a new type entirely unpublished: bell-shaped, shiny metal and with walls that become transparent when seated ... "
